Broken Pinocchio’s.

Start with the economy. Getting nothing to do with ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe, with his noisy strike in the midst of broken windows and demolished pillars of head-quarters building during this month, the recent protests of Benelux and France steel workers, put Nation of the shit from camel turned around, Cocaine Royal Family of Lancaster’s and English speaking World in big frenzy. Which was the exact way, I tell you more lately. Now though, I want speak about russian word “нельзя”, French word “coincidence” and swine from Brussels and Strasburg word with shitty smell of China - “a shusha-shusha”. Which coincidently give us the burned whores hound at the coincident day of 13^th. Again, the e-mail received at 09:57:09 from UK’s Total Job (Senior Business Development Managers To £54,000 basic salary plus excellent benefits. Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Chelmsford, Exeter, Glasgow, Leicester, Leeds, Liverpool, London, Maidstone, Manchester, Newcastle, Redhill, Watford) which I was careful enough to tennising back to the Prince Phillip and his muchachos (mean, Trevor Edwards, Senior Consultant, Mutual House, 5^th floor, 70 Conduit Street, London, W1S 2GF, cell:07778 031 934, Tel.:0207 837 5881, trevoredwards@pscexecutive.com, A BNB Recruitment Solutions Plc Company) – hit on the spot. In direct and indirect meaning. For my sincere pleasure, more yet after MY WRITING won the 1,5 of the Nord, I devote a lot of time to PLAY with broken Pinocchio’s to whom I call ongoing piggy faces from Brussels and Strasburg. Which they not only clearly see, but “like” in did, because regularly send me assassins, waiting at my porch, change the neighbors in my building every two weeks, and shifting the lot of Polish plumbers, who like to work a limpa-merdas – i.e. municipal cleaners, etc. Seeing too, how (permanecer na sombra), I can impregnate “influenza” (i.e. swine’s flu) to the more highest level possible. Such as House of Commons, Speakers, Peers and another Baron’s balderdash. In such degree, that in the course exist the strong possibility to strip out from Knighthood the common thief Fred Goodwin. Windsor with his associate “put in” – BUY THE NAME! And not the bicycle, the chair, the mum, the Khan and another Cocaine Royal Family of Lancaster’s rubbish. Never play scrap? Me ether. But I tell you what; all cards are Chinese, essentially if you speak about Europe, or russian steel, or UK’s politics, or NATO. All give the same, the victims of abortion such as Danzig Corridor Countries or almohads bankers – give the same. They, listen the declaration of goat Mordashov in respect his steel in US’s operations. Give us British steel in Norwegian Railways. With the Prince Phillip with his muchachos, stealing £22 million per year or not. (I was watching TV programme yesterday about bankers directors bonuses). Anyway it’s морды (faces), it’s “a preto”, and it’s the how cocaine Royal Family of Lancaster’s, glued the dead of pregnant women in Cambria with her little daughter to the visit of O’bama to Israel. Through the Bletchley House. This, if you know the story, was dedicated to decipher my CV. By the very well known policy-makers. Seems, without apparent success during the last fifteen years.   

But, go to change a bit the subject. Let’s speak about the photographs day before of the burned EU castle. They where in the blogs “Reward equivalences” and in “300 years Dom”. With “ground-breaking” multibillion businesses signature of Southern Stream, during which, naturally happens huge blows in Armenia and Moscow, maybe to explain unnatural greediness of Kremlin-EU piggy faces. They know this too. Why was the “ethnical cleansing” effectuated by these participants. Firstly in Brussels and Strasburg (The European Commission on May 13 fined chipmaker Intel 1.06 billion Euros). You remember the Spanish Natural Gas merge of 16 billion Euros? I wrote carefully and in detail, WHO. And then in Moscow, when the face of Smolensky – Gasangadjiev was not good enough to burden the weight of Putin-Medvedev financial purse. After dirty e-mail send by these goats, was wandering: Do you lost the Nord? Плешивый ты мухомор, see to much “Nochnoy Dozor”? In this serial, which I never see, was Руны and Huns together or fighting each other, something like that. Is this the case, or you just one more swine face from “logical” side of barricade? Because, now I go to put another such compilation from your earthy financial purse. Just make sure that all participants understand that this is worthwhile venture and you're in – hook, line and sinker.

Intel Fined By European Commission Oxford Analytica 05.15.09, 6:00 AM ET The European Commission on May 13 fined chipmaker Intel 1.06 billion euros ($1.44 billion) for anti-competitive practices. The fine highlights the Commission's willingness to tackle what it sees as major abuses of market power in the IT sector. However, the unusual nature of the industry makes such abuses both hard to identify and hard to resolve, a contributing factor in the extreme length of the investigation. The case also casts light on a changing international anti-trust environment, where the interests of the major authorities--and especially those of the E.U. and U.S.--are converging. IT peculiarities. Particular aspects of the IT sector, both in hardware and software, make it a particular challenge for anti-trust regulators: --It is subject to substantial scale and network economies, with high investment costs (in the form of R&D) and very low marginal costs. The rewards of market share are unusually high and self-reinforcing. --On the other hand, the very dynamic nature of the market creates the constant possibility of "leapfrogging" technologies, in which producers can be made irrelevant by new entrants redefining the scope of a market, and therefore market share. --The law on intellectual property, standards and interoperability is central to cases in the sector, and still remains fluid. Large IT firms thus argue that these characteristics call for a different approach from anti-trust authorities, in which market share is less important than costs to consumers. Moreover, they argue that anti-trust rulings can be used as a proxy for competition in the market, at the consumers' expense. However, in the wake of damning judgments against software company Microsoft, such charges have become more difficult to sustain. In a series of cases, the E.U. has argued large IT firms have been guilty of breaching Article 82 of the E.U. treaty, which covers abuse of dominant positions through such tactics as exclusionary deals and predatory pricing. Intel's is in some way the largest of these. International anti-trust. The nature of the Commission's Intel investigation--dealing with the activities of U.S.-based firms operating worldwide--illustrates the value of a coordinated international response to antitrust legislation. Efforts to harmonize the activities of anti-trust agencies across borders floundered during the administration of former U.S. President George W. Bush. Rulings by European and East Asian anti-trust authorities tended during this period to be harsher than those of an avowedly 'light touch' U.S. regime, which as late as 2008 encouraged a lenient interpretation of section 2 of the Sherman Act, the US equivalent of Article 82. U.S. treatment of the Microsoft case was notably more lenient than the Commission's, creating particular challenges for enforcement of European rulings mandating a change of behavior by the firm. In announcing an immediate appeal against the Commission ruling, Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini was quick to claim European demands for changed behavior were impractical, while expressing optimism for a more sympathetic hearing from US authorities. Outlook. The election of President Barack Obama and his appointment of Assistant Attorney General in charge of Antitrust at the Department of Justice Christine Varney has announced what many see as a major shift in U.S. policy. In the face of U.S. activism, the E.U. will not decline as an arena for anti-trust battles--it is too large a market, and is likely to retain a more hard-line legal philosophy toward monopolists, given the time needed to overturn U.S. light-touch policy entrenched in court rulings. However, it does open the possibility of less divergent rulings on areas such as pricing interoperability of software, making orders of changed behavior by firms more workable internationally, and therefore rendering anti-trust law more effective in the future.

Executives drop out after FSA scrutiny May 17 2009 23:28 Several executives lined up for senior positions at British financial institutions have withdrawn after the Financial Services Authorityquestioned their competence for the job. The news is further evidence of the City regulator’s increasingly hands-on approach in vetting executives and directors of large banks following the near-collapse of several large lenders. Until last year, FSA scrutiny of senior executives was limited to weeding out those with a history of fraud or other misconduct. The regulator now questions prospective chairmen, chief executives, finance directors and risk directors of large financial institutions to make sure that they have a proper understanding of the company they are joining, the industry in which it operates, and their regulatory responsibilities. Hector Sants, the FSA’s chief executive, said last week that the regulator had interviewed 51 candidates for senior jobs since it adopted its new approach in October. “In a number of cases applications have been withdrawn following interviews that raised questions concerning the candidate’s fitness and propriety,” he told the Association of Corporate Treasurers. The FSA’s changed approach follows intense criticism of the executives and non-executive directors of large banks such as Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS, which expanded rapidly during the boom and have since been rescued by the government. Mr Sants has said people should be “frightened” of the regulator. However, the FSA would not say how many candidates had withdrawn or which institutions were involved. It comes amid a broader debate about corporate governance of banks and the role that non-executive directors should play in preventing excessive risk-taking. MPs on the Treasury select committee last week called for limits Sir David Walker, the former banker and regulator, is preparing a report on corporate governance which is due to be published in the autumn. Mr Sants has thrown his weight behind calls for non-executive directors with greater technical expertise who are willing to challenge strategic decisions made by executives. “Clearly, this will require [non-executives] to work on a more full-time basis and be compensated appropriately,” he said in a speech at the Securities & Investment Institute conference earlier this month.