Saturday 29 May 2010

Markets fret, but…



Markets fret, but… To find some editorial in Reuters, - I initiate to asking myself if I see correctly how it is. Name of the article is “Markets fret, but a chance of big bank crash is slim”. Remembering too much things like: “A Lambretta”, “A mortgages”, “A Libor”, etc. All this coming from the “Campos Kozlovsky”, - that кoзло-вонючие козлы people (if you remember), ‘banker’. Who was handed below the Blackfriars Bridge. This company (I call them ongoing piggy faces from Brussels and Starsburg) which insists in put my head thinking: -‘Tenho a mortgages para pagar do meu crido flatinho, (from the sad suburbs in Odivelas), - and already all theirs problems will go. Theirs off-shore accounts in Switzerland, Nassau, and Marshal Isles, this ‘Helvetia Wealth’, this x5 of medium national salaries will quickly be “arranged”. All of them persist in harassing me in this irresponsible way. They like to think about theirs wishes without trying to think. They are too much the “Armstrong & Miller” (from that sketch), too much inside the “Roda de Fortuna” to go down and destrocar pelos miudos… However, the reality is: The London Interbank borrowing costs (Libor), - is ‘…much-watched gauge of the trust banks have in each other – rose to a 10-month high this week, unsettling investors…’ (it’s how the Reuters are preying), ‘but many blame the problem mainly on a shortage of dollars in the system than outright fear of a bank counterparty failing…’ Rubbish! All this I say thousands times before. Very short one: - ‘Board of Trustees, - I don’t trust.’ It’s just one more period of skinny cows! That’s all. Okay, yet we have an other important indicator to measure all the rest of our cocoa (cit. Reuters), -‘the spread between 3-month dollar Libor and overnight (i.e. Who f*** whom last night, who pay whom last round, etc. I call this the Basel II Interbank Agreement. Which is wrong, but кoзло-вонючие козлы, - whatever, it’s your legs), ‘…indexed swap rates – has hit 0, 33% three times its level a month ago’... That’s why I pass quickly through the price which principal Europe lenders should pays for theirs “haircut”. Actually, the lofty 30-50% - they say. Well, this is a Reuters. Such a big and distant Lord of Underworld, which using his prowesses to my advantage can make from me for certain, the Lord of Underwear… However, if I insist, - I can get into the core of the considered necessary relationships. This is 120 billion euros arranges between Germany and France, for God sick! The other rats, (watch pictures), - already …’cut theirs exposure to other banks inside and outside the eurozone. But, …’core are seeing (to see how “somebody” are pissing into theirs mouths) ‘…a decline in commercial paper. That common short-term funding tool: European bank’s commercial paper market borrowing stood at $277 billion on Thursday, down 8% (the “somebody” who’s made in eight) from the end of March. Borrowing by Spanish banks was down 13% (again that “somebody” who’s out of team) during that time to $58, 4 billion according to data from Dealogic (well, - I prey for ‘that’…). Spain’s big two banks, Santander and BBVA, were the two biggest European banks issuer of commercial paper’… (look at the quantity of my Blogs)…’ in the first quarter 2010, and worries about a squeeze in funds rattle investors’. The next phrase: -‘But they have been attracting funding diverted from (?) the embattled cajas (!), or small regional banks.’ Let’s be honest, - Please, piss in my mouth. ‘… Santander raised 30 billion of new deposits in the first quarter. It also issued 15 billion euros (12.7 billion pounds) in debt maturing in 2010.’ Mister “Bota in” – a Bovespa? A-a-a, to grow in “somebody’s” eye through the ratings… ’…The rise in funding costs makes capital and liquidity more costly for banks just as regulators are pilling pressure on them to increase theirs buffers.’ (Fed Funds mano, from me - no comments) ‘But the European Central Bank’s exceptional funding programmes (Aquele gajo não vale nada…) – “… means that we do not think that there will be a systematic funding crisis as there was in late 2008, said Andrew Lim, analyst at Matrix.’

No comments: