Sunday, 17 January 2010

“Anything with an 8 handles, is tempting now”.


“Anything with an 8 handles, is tempting now”. On the BBC evening news, I see the O’Bama with Bush standing at his left, and Clinton to his right talking about the Haitian crisis. Which the Lady Clinton, in the same report called a “Biblical proportion” calamity. Mum-m-m, the nice people don’t start arguments. Nice people don’t complain when they’re presented with unsatisfactory situations. Nice people don’t come out fighting when they backed into a corner. Personally, if all this is true, there clearly must be times when I had to stop trying so hard to be polite. Dear O’Bama, Bush and Clinton couple, aren’t that I being just a little too forgiving of a situation that warrant more an objection, or even, an outright condemnation? Maybe, you’re carry on to don’t see how it’s probably time to become, if not exactly nasty, at least a little more proactive in working play? Are need to say that on my side, (i.e. my money) I should do a lot to ensure that a sensitive relationships is based on real mutual respect, and not just a superficial attention to ‘nicely’.

Kraft Must Raise Cadbury Offer by 10%, Shareholder Survey Shows. Jan. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Kraft Foods Inc. must raise its hostile 11 billion-pound ($17.9 billion) bid for Cadbury Plc by at least 10 percent to stand a chance of capturing the U.K. maker of Dairy Milk chocolate, an investor survey shows.Kraft, whose offer is worth about 771 pence a share, needs to raise that to at least 850 pence, the median price named by 9 Cadbury shareholders, who together account for about 11 percent of the shares. Responses ranged from 800 pence to 900 pence. A deadline to increase the bid passes on Jan. 19. Cadbury closed at 793.5 pence on Jan. 15, 2.9 percent above the value of Kraft’s bid, reflecting the chance the offer will be raised or a rival suitor such asHershey Co. will emerge. Hershey is stepping up efforts to prepare a bid and plans to make a decision after Kraft’s final offer, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Kraft Chief Executive Officer Irene Rosenfeld has vowed to stay “disciplined” on price. “There’s a lot of value in Cadbury,” said Peter Langerman, CEO of Mutual Series, which is a subsidiary of Franklin Resources Inc., which has a 7.7 percent stake in Cadbury. “When you look at the numbers that make sense for both Cadbury and Kraft, their offer is materially lower than that,” he said Jan. 15 in a telephone interview. Franklin Resources will reject the bid if it isn’t improved, Langerman said. The U.K. company’s second-largest investor, Legal & General Group Plc, said it remains opposed to Kraft’s offer on valuation grounds. Rival Offer? “Our position on Cadbury is unchanged; we continue to believe that the current Kraft bid does not reflect the long- term value offered by the company on a standalone basis,” Mark Burgess, head of equities at Legal & General, said in a statement. The insurer owned about 70 million Cadbury shares, a 5.1 percent stake, according to a Jan. 13 filing. Rival bidders have until Jan. 23 to decide whether to make a counter-proposal. Cadbury Chief Executive Officer Todd Stitzer said this week that Hershey and Cadbury could make an “appealing” combination. Hershey has been drafting commitment letters with its lenders, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp., to secure a multi-billion-dollar loan package, according to people with knowledge of the matter. “If Kraft walk away, it’s not the end of the world,” said Andy Brown, chief executive officer of Cedar Rock Capital Ltd. in London. “Just because they are the only corporation to have made an offer, it doesn’t mean they’re going to win or that’s what the company is worth.” ‘Short-Term Gain’ Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.’s Ann Thivierge said she “won’t be disappointed” if Kraft’s bid is rejected or the Toblerone maker walks away.Mario Gabelli, the chairman and chief executive officer of Gamco Investors Inc., also said his investment in Cadbury doesn’t hinge on a merger. “We don’t mind owning Cadbury for the next five years,” said Gabelli, whose mutual-fund firm owned almost 2.8 million American depository shares in Cadbury as of June 30. To be sure, some investors say the lack of a competitive auction means they’re prepared to sell for less than they originally anticipated. “Anything with an 8 handle is tempting now,” David Crawford, a fund manager at Octopus Investment Ltd. in London, said in an interview. “With the bid where it is, they don’t have to add much of a premium to get there.” Octopus owns 650,000 Cadbury shares. Crawford said he bought his holding after Kraft’s approach for a “short-term gain.” Cadbury shares closed at 568 pence Sept. 4, the last trading day before Kraft announced its proposal. Earnings Multiples. Jeffrey Scharf, president of Santa Cruz, California-based Scharf Investments, said 900 pence-a-share would be “compelling,” while an offer in the “low 800s” may struggle. Scharf Investments has about 760,000 Cadbury shares. In a document sent to shareholders on Jan. 12, Cadbury said comparable deals in the confectionery industry have taken place at multiples between 14.3 and 18.5 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, whereas Kraft’s offer values the company at 12 times 2009 earnings. A bid at 14.3 times Cadbury’s 2009 earnings would come to more than 900 pence a share, according to Bloomberg calculations. “Kraft have been very smart, and if they win Cadbury they’ll get a bargain,” said Phil Spencer, who helps manage 7.4 million Cadbury shares for private clients at Brewin Dolphin Ltd., which has 20 billion pounds under management. “Even if they come back with 850 pence though, it’ll come down to the wire. Cadbury’s defense has been compelling.” Lifting Sales. In response to Kraft’s approach, Cadbury has lifted sales and profitability goals, outlined plans for improving cashflow, and highlighted the benefits of its presence in faster-growing emerging markets from India to Brazil. “Cadbury’s management haven’t put a foot wrong, they’ve been pugnacious and I can’t fault their defense,” said John Haynes, who helps manage 12 billion pounds including 5 million Cadbury shares at Rensburg Sheppards Plc in London. “I would still have problems selling at 850 pence, I don’t think that’s nearly enough for this unique asset. I am absolutely happy to remain a holder for three years.”

My phrase to EU from “Rising Arizona” film.


My phrase to EU from “Rising Arizona” film. The “Generosity” is my middle name – everyone who knows me knows it. Now, to don’t let this wonderful quality to come between me and the a “coworker” (I.e. the 500 million consumers, the Trichet, etc.) can be the real priority. While I see that’s a lofty goal, I just feel as if theirs (Sampaio & Co, you know how I call them) – ideas aren’t as original as they believe. Sincerely, seems that they’re just being wacky for theirs own sake. If I spread it out evenly – I may be though to turn something very tricky into something wonderful (something of the COP15 stuff). Let’s try to don’t judge the methods to theirs madness (like that bad Spanish from that film “Rising Arizona”) until I’ve seen how things play out.

OPA of ‘Il mio esposo’: Camargo tem de lançar OPA concorrente ou retirar proposta de fusão. 16/01/10 13:55. O regulador do mercado notificou hoje a Camargo Corrêa para que esta lance uma OPA concorrente à da CSN ou retire a sua proposta de fusão à Cimpor. A Camargo tem dez dias para se pronunciar.A Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários (CMVM) anunciou, em comunicado, ter notificado a empresa brasileira Camargo Corrêa “do início de procedimento administrativo com vista a que esta conforme a sua proposta de fusão com a Cimpor ao regime das ofertas concorrentes […]” Caso contrário, o regulador escreve que a Camargo Corrêa tem de retirar a sua proposta de fusão “e se abstenha de a publicitar ou divulgar e de praticar quaisquer actos com ela relacionados”. A Camargo Corrêa tem, a partir de hoje, dez dias úteis para se pronunciar, sendo que o regime das OPA concorrentes obriga ao pagamento de um prémio de, pelo menos, mais 2% acima da contrapartida anterior. A proposta de fusão apresentada pela Camargo Corrêa foi comunicada ao mercado pela Cimpor, a 13 de Janeiro deste ano, e foi contestada pelos também brasileiros da Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN) que, no final de Dezembro, lançaram uma OPA sobre a totalidade do capital da Cimpor. A OPA da CSN foi considerada "hostil" pela administração da Cimpor que classificou a oferta de "irrelevante e perturbadora", tendo recomendado aos accionistas a rejeição da oferta que consideram subavaliar o valor da Cimpor. Em requerimento apresentado ao regulador, e a propósito da proposta de fusão da Camargo, a CSN tinha solicitado à CMVM que adoptasse “os procedimentos necessários com vista a repor o normal funcionamento dos mercados que considera afectado pela divulgação da proposta da Camargo Corrêa”, na medida em que afirma “tratar-se de proposta que, entre outros aspectos, se destina a obter o controlo da sociedade em condições mais favoráveis do que as que seriam impostas a um oferente concorrente, em contradição com o regime das OPA”. A Camargo Corrêa tinha apresentado, a 13 de Janeiro, uma proposta de fusão com a Cimpor, que implicava a incorporação dos seus activos de cimentos na esfera dos activos da cimenteira portuguesa. Os brasileiros prometeram ainda aos accionistas o pagamento de um dividendo extraordinário de até 350 milhões. A Camargo impunha como condição para a fusão a compra prévia de 15% a 25% da Cimpor. O regulador vem dar razão à CSN que tem em cima da mesa uma proposta para comprar cada acção da Cimpor por 5,75 euros. As acções da Cimpor fecharam na sexta-feira a ganhar 0,17% e a valer 6,37 euros.

Assessing the ‘relationship’ where “I am in”.


Assessing the ‘relationship’ where “I am in”. Here we come. As usual, much of this weekend is absorbed by the concerns, dramas, highs, lows, and soap operas that my ‘friends’ or ‘Abramovitch relatives’ continues to slog through. (I.e. the elections in Chile and Ukraine). Where I still to be captive by XXX old whore in this never-ending saga. Seems too, that is I who choose to be that droid who can’t stop to watching and worrying. Problem is, my the dear Royal Family of Lancaster’s, that to be wrapped up, isn’t mean at all that you may feel like participating in my plans for your own plans and finally – your happiness. You don’t care if I find myself in a potentially lucrative situation. And (apparently), surrounded by highly motivated people that honor my skills and identify personally with my work, views and ethics. Of course, as beautiful a picture as this does not appear to be, it’s not guaranteed, nor is it instant. I recall that this will take some time to tweak things up and make previously made promises good. This can pass through deleted prior ‘agreements’ than start over again, brand new negotiations’, terms, even the whole new plan of action. (Do me favor Andy – don’t forget how you hit in my head tonight, trying to impregnate me with your “Baltic sloop”. The six stolen skin coats – make you leader in “put-in” arrangements…) International Power PLC (LSE: IPR) is an international electricity generator formed in 2000 by the demerger of National Power. It is headquartered at Senator House, 85 Queen Victoria Street in the City of London. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange and, after a two and a half year absence, it rejoined the FTSE 100 Index in March 2005.
GDF-Suez dances round International Power. Lina Saigol. Published: January 16 2010 21:47 | Last updated: January 16 2010 21:47. Whenever a European chief executive shouts loudly about not doing a big deal, he or she often announces one not long after. So it’s no surprise that talk of GDF-Suez launching a £11bn takeover of International Power became louder after the French utility’s chief executive said last week that the group would not make a large acquisition this year. That sent shares in International Power to a 15-month high on Friday, but is it just traders trying to kick-start a listless M&A market or is there something going on? Here’s a glimpse of the reality. People in the know say the French government, GDF-Suez’s biggest shareholder with a 36 per cent stake, has given the company the go-ahead to hire bankers and explore a deal. Late last year, GDF mandated Goldman Sachs, Rothschild and BNP to do just that and discussions with International Power, which is understood to be using Nomura, have been taking place since. Proposals have been batted around, but so far, nothing definitive has been agreed . GDF-Suez should take this opportunity seriously. This would be a compelling proposal which would combine two leading power operators with significant synergies and the power to exploit faster growth demand from markets like the Middle East and Africa. For GDF-Suez, money isn’t an issue. The French group has the cash to finance the deal and, having been created out of an incredibly complex and politically charged merger itself, the French group should have enough experience to integrate the British company smoothly. One problem holding up the deal could be the French regional elections, due to take place during the middle of March, but shareholders concerned that GDF-Suez will struggle to meet its 2011 EBITDA targets organically, could help push it through with the support of the French government. Investors across all industries are eager to see the companies in which to invest use the cash they have built-up during the economic recession on M&A, so long as it makes sound strategic sense and involves sensible levels of debt. A GDF-Suez takeover of International Power would be exactly that and a good way to set the tone for dealmaking this year.

Saturday, 16 January 2010

watched his son


Prince of Wales pays tribute to armed forces girlfriends in front of Kate...
Telegraph.co.uk - Laura Roberts - ‎3 hours ago‎
The Prince of Wales paid tribute to the girlfriends of troops serving in the Armed Forces as Kate Middleton watched his son Prince William receive his wings as a fully-fledged helicopter pilot.

A big subject.



A big subject (i.e. A PRETO) can be handled in small steps, especially when it comes across whole generations. Normally, the “opposition” likes to challenge us all in the always same topics, - of the financial status quo. However, to soberly speaking, the question remains, - who owes what to whom? And than off course, - how much of it can come to my way? You know how I call them? Com’on! When it comes to cash like today, you see by yourself that for me – is the day for honesty.

Ackman Buys 2% Kraft Stake, Urges More Cash for Cadbury Offer. Jan. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire investor William Ackman bought a $950 million stake in Kraft Foods Inc. and urged its Chief Executive Officer Irene Rosenfeld to limit the amount of stock she uses to bid for Cadbury Plc. Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP bought at least 32 million shares in Kraft, or 2 percent of the company, and plans to purchase more, Ackman said in an interview yesterday. Pershing’s stake in Kraft is now the firm’s biggest holding. Pershing thinks “very highly of Irene Rosenfeld and her business plan,” and believes Kraft’s 11 billion-pound ($17.9 billion) stock-and-cash bid for Cadbury makes “tremendous sense,” Ackman said. Kraft risks diminishing the deal’s merits by issuing too much stock to pay for it, he said, echoing a warning by investorWarren Buffett on Jan. 5. “The more Kraft stock they issue, the less interesting this deal is,” Ackman said. “Fortunately, the seller also prefers cash.” Ackman said Kraft stock is “extremely undervalued.” The Pershing stake will be disclosed in a filing with U.K. regulators on Jan. 18, Ackman said. Kraft, based in Northfield, Illinois, has until Jan. 19 to modify its offer for Uxbridge, England-based Cadbury, the maker of Dairy Milk chocolate. Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Kraft’s biggest shareholder, said this month that it voted against a plan to issue millions of shares to finance a Cadbury takeover, saying it amounted to a “blank check” to raise the bid. Kraft advanced 46 cents to $29.58 in New York Stock Exchange composite tradingyesterday. The stock has risen 7.8 percent since Berkshire made its statement. ‘Great Confidence’. Ackman’s investment “is a sign of great confidence in our management and our company’s future prospects,” said Michael Mitchell, a Kraft spokesman, in an e-mailed statement. Ackman said Hershey Co., the Pennsylvania-based chocolate maker that’s controlled by a charitable trust, won’t submit a rival bid because it would imperil its own financial viability. “I don’t see how the trustees of a charity can put at risk everything that Milton Hershey built to do a leveraged buyout of Cadbury,” he said. Hershey has been weighing a bid and has until Jan. 23 to make a final decision. Kirk Saville, a Hershey spokesman, declined to comment. It’s not the first time Ackman has laid a bet on a Cadbury takeover. In early 2007, he bought Cadbury shares on speculation that Kraft would buy the company, he told investors in a letter last year. He sold the stake in the last half of 2008 after concluding that turmoil in the credit markets made a sale less likely, he said in the letter, adding, “we were wrong.” Current Offer. Kraft’s current offer for Cadbury, of 300 pence of cash and 0.2589 Kraft shares, consists of 61 percent stock and 39 percent cash, based on the closing value of Kraft’s shares yesterday. Kraft is also offering Cadbury shareholders an option to substitute up to 60 pence of shares with cash. Kraft may be able to increase the cash portion of its offer without further negotiations with its lenders. In addition to a 5.5 billion-pound ($9 billion) bridge loan it’s getting from Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, and seven other banks, it has an agreement to borrow $3 billion (1.84 billion pounds), according to a Dec. 4 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Rosenfeld was in London last week meeting with major Cadbury shareholders. The U.K. company’s shares have traded at a premium to her offer, which was first disclosed on Sept. 7, as investors bet she will raise the bid or a rival offer will emerge. Cadbury fell 5.5 pence to 793.5 in London trading yesterday, while Kraft’s offer currently values the stock at 771 pence. A takeover of Cadbury would give Kraft, the maker of Toblerone chocolate and Tang powdered drinks, a faster-growing business and access to emerging markets. The combined company would have about $50 billion in annual sales. “There were so many investment banks working on the deal that there hasn’t been good research on what the combination would look like,” Ackman said. “We think that’s among the reasons that Kraft is undervalued.” Lazard Ltd., Centerview Partners, Citigroup, and Deutsche Bank are advising Kraft, and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, and UBS AG are counseling Cadbury. Seven other banks are part of a group of lenders for Kraft’s bid. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. are in discussions about financing a Hershey bid. To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York atzmider1@bloomberg.net. Last Updated: January 16, 2010 00:01 EST

Friday, 15 January 2010

Gosh tie.


Gosh tie. What the epic week it has been! A such big eclipse. Such a huge invitation to reconsider the importance of a commitment/s or an agreement/s. It’s not that this does not matter, far from it. It matters so much, that I must surely now look at what more I can do to “honor” this and keep me alive. Before I fall a sleep, the “someone” break my spine. O C’mon! You know how it’s feels with a broken spine?! Mum-m-m, the more “intimae” characteristics, the aspects which I’m looking to hind from indiscrete eyes, - become World domain… In this way, I should say that to going through the motions, thought the sense of duty – You who should take a break! Because this, takes away for completely the true feeling of inspiration for any “one”, for any “commonwealth civilization”, for any “particular promise”… It’s exactly what, like you all know, and lead me to tie myself to a set of “OUR” circumstances. There was and keep be a good reason. That reason is still good. The 2010 is here.

World Economic Forum Global Risks report warns of long shadow of the Financial Crisis 14/01/2010 17:00 (1 Day 00:49 minutes ago) The FINANCIAL -- The World Economic Forum on January 14 released Global Risks 2010, its annual report on the most significant and underlying global risks facing the global economy this year and beyond. The World Economic Forum today released Global Risks 2010, highlighting a number of underlying risks that contributed to and were exacerbated by the financial crisis and global economic downturn. Fiscal crises and unemployment, underinvestment in infrastructure – especially in energy and agriculture – and chronic disease are identified as the pivotal areas of risk over the next years. Other risks identified as equally systemic in nature, and requiring better global governance, are transnational crime and corruption, biodiversity loss and cyber-vulnerability. According to Swiss Re, the report argues that the events of the past year have revealed a fundamental need to change thinking on global risks and how they are managed. With unprecedented levels of interconnectedness between all areas of risk, the report stresses that the need to combat governance gaps globally is greater than ever. It argues that this can only be addressed by an overhaul of current values and behaviors by decision-makers to improve coordination and supervision. Robert Greenhill, Managing Director and Chief Business Officer at the World Economic Forum, said Global Risks 2010 underlines the challenges ahead: “The findings of the report confirm that we must face up to the challenges created by these unprecedented levels of interconnectedness between risks. The financial crisis and the ensuing recession have created a more vulnerable environment where unaddressed risks may become tomorrow’s crises.”. The Global Risks report is published yearly ahead of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, and is produced in partnership with Citigroup, Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC), Swiss Re, the Wharton School Risk Center and Zurich Financial Services. The result of year-long consultations with experts from business, academia and policy-making, Global Risks 2010 marks the fifth edition of the report, coinciding with the 40th anniversary of the Forum. Global Risks 2010 highlights the impact of the fiscal crisis and the social and political implications of high unemployment rates in several major economies as key concerns. Notably, the current models for health, education and unemployment protection have been put under severe strain by the fiscal crisis, notwithstanding the longer-term implications of increasing life expectancy. Daniel M Hofmann, group chief economist of Zurich Financial Services said, “The events of the last year have shown that there are underlying risks within the global economy that need to be addressed. In reaction to the financial crisis, many countries have put themselves at risk of overextending their fiscal positions and being burdened with extremely high levels of debt. This could put upward pressure on real interest rates, rein back growth and lead to protracted high levels of unemployment.” More widely, the report points to the impact of the global recession on longstanding under-investment in infrastructure, especially in energy and agriculture, and the rising costs of treating chronic disease. These “creeping” risks have not appeared overnight, but the recession has limited the ability of decision-makers to combat them effectively. This is particularly true for energy with respect to the pressing global need to invest in infrastructure. John Drzik, CEO of Oliver Wyman, an MMC operating company, said, “The recent drop in oil prices has been good for consumers, but has also contributed to a significant cut in much-needed investment in energy infrastructure and renewable energy projects. This comes at a time when governments – as well as business and consumers – are looking for long-term security of an energy supply that is both sustainably-sourced and reasonably priced. The fragile global economy will make itself more susceptible to oil price-related shocks if this underinvestment continues.” A massive US$ 35 trillion of infrastructure investment is required over the next 20 years, according to the World Bank . “This is particularly acute for agriculture and food security,” said Swiss Re’s Chief Risk Officer Raj Singh. “We need a vast increase in food production to feed the growing world population, and a billion people are already undernourished. Billions of dollars need to be spent on water provision, energy supply, transport and climate change adaptation measures. Governments must work together with the private sector to make it happen. Insurers can provide risk management tools that create greater financial stability for farmers and the agriculture industry.” The report also highlights risks where the levels of awareness and preparedness are currently very low; these include transnational crime and corruption, cyber-vulnerability and biodiversity loss. Global Risks 2010 notes that the response to the impact of the financial crisis and ensuing downturn has been a greater willingness to cooperate on common strategies and develop more effective global governance to address global risks. However, Sheana Tambourgi, editor of the report and Director and Head of the Global Risk Network at the World Economic Forum, warned, “The next few months will put the willingness among global decision-makers to cooperate on addressing global risks to the test. Simply reverting to ‘business as usual’ could have serious implications in the long term in several risk areas

Europe Oil Supply Insulated From Russia, Belarus Spat, IEA Says. Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Germany, Poland and three other European countries that receive Russian oil supplies via the Druzhba pipeline across Belarus can weather a potential disruption, the International Energy Agency said. “Although there is no imminent threat of tighter European crude supplies, given what is as stake for Belarus, a resolution may take some time to achieve,” the IEA said in a report today. The five European countries, which include Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, have more than three months of emergency stocks and alternative supply routes, the IEA said. Russia and Belarus have failed to reach an oil supply deal after a tax agreement from 2007 expired at the end of last year. A dispute over customs and transit fees that year between the two countries led to supply disruptions for about three days. OAO Transneft, Russia’s state run pipeline operator, warned that oil flows to Belarus’s Mozyr refinery may stop next week as suppliers haven’t confirmed shipments. Both Belarus and Russia say the dispute won’t affect deliveries to Europe. Poland received 385,000 barrels a day, or 93 percent of its oil imports last year, through Druzhba’s northern branch, while Germany got from 300,000 to 400,000 barrels a day, or as much as 20 percent of its imports, via the link, the IEA said. Poland and Germany can take supplies through their Baltic Sea ports in the event of pipeline disruption, the IEA said. Alternative Oil Routes. The southern leg of Druzhba, which runs from Belarus through Ukraine, shipped 115,000 barrels a day to Slovakia and 130,000 barrels a day to Hungary, all of the two countries’ oil imports last year, the IEA said. The link supplied the Czech Republic with 90,000 barrels of oil a day, or 60 percent of its imports last year. Hungary and Slovakia have an alternative import route through Croatia from the Adriatic Sea while the Czech Republic can get oil supplies from Trieste, Italy, the IEA report said. Belarus received an implicit subsidy of about $2.5 billion per year under the expired accord with Russia, the IEA said. Russia, which views Belarus as a strategic ally and key transit state, allowed its neighbor to benefit from lower oil prices by discounting the export duty for supplies to its refineries. Russia, which plans to reinstate full taxation on most crude shipped to Belarusian refineries, may recoup as much as $2 billion for its budget at current oil prices, Igor Kurinnyy, an oil analyst at ING Groep NV, said by e-mail yesterday.

Belgium's diamond exports rise in Dec. Belgian polished exports in December rose 13% by volume and 18.5% by value in December, compared to the same month in 2008, according to figures published by the Antwerp World Diamond Centre Diamond Office. December polished exports totalled 687,791 carats, or $779.5 million in dollar terms. For the year as a whole, Belgium’s polished exports fell 16.5% by volume to 7.28 million carats. By value, exports of polished was 30% lower at $8.63 billion, compares to January-December 2008. Polished exports to the United States represented 27.5% of total polished diamond exports by value, and only 13.9% in volume for the year. Hong Kong accounted for 21.5% of total polished exports by value and 20.2% by volume last year. Israel was the third largest importer of Belgian polished, representing 9.9% by value and 7.3% by volume of Belgium’s total polished exports. Polished diamond imports rose 5.5% by volume to 563,879 carats in December, compared to December 2008. By value imports for the month totalled $640.8 million, an increase of 1.6% on prior year period. For the full year, polished diamond imports were 23.6% lower at 7.35 million carats in volume terms. In value terms polished imports were 34.2% lower at $7.95 billion. Rough diamond exports jumped 264.0% last month, from December 2008 to 11.96 million carats by volume. By value exports jumped 176.5% to $851.7 million. For the full year of 2009, rough exports fell 16.5% by volume and 31% by value. Rough diamond imports rose 46.1% by volume and 100.3% by value, compared to December 2008. For 2009, rough diamond imports dropped 22.9% by volume and 39.2% by value.

Intel results boost technology sector. January 14 2010 23:28. Intel gave a boost to the technology sector on Thursday, predicting a better year after fourth-quarter growth in sales of its chips was almost double the norm. The chipmaker beat analysts’ expectations with profits of $2.3bn, 875 per cent higher than a year ago, when Intel made $234m in the teeth of the recession and a failing order book. Intel’s microprocessors are used in four out of every five computers sold and its strong “holiday” quarter augurs well for PC makers, software companies and other chipmakers at the start of the US tech earnings season. “The fourth quarter was a strong ending to a year with a difficult beginning,” said Stacy Smith, chief financial officer. “We have seen a return of consumer demand and replenishment to normal inventory levels after the precipitous demand drop at the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009.” Sales worth $10.6bn were up 13 per cent on the third quarter, nearly twice the average seasonal growth and ahead of the analysts’ consensus of $10.2bn by Thomson Reuters. Paul Otellini, chief executive, said the results had been made possible by “unprecedented operating efficiencies”. Intel, which has led other chipmakers in moving to new degrees of miniaturisation, introduced chips with circuit widths narrowing from 45 to 32 billionths of a metre at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas last week. “The demand picture in the quarter reflected broad-based strength across all regions and all product categories, with notebooks leading the way,” he told analysts. Intel beat analysts’ expectations for the current quarter with its forecasts. It predicted revenues of about $9.7bn compared with a consensus of $9.34bn by Bloomberg. For 2010, it forecast that gross margins would rise to about 61 per cent, five percentage points up on 2009. Last year was marked by a $1.45bn fine levied by the European Commission and a $1.25bn settlement with rival Advanced Micro Devices .

Thursday, 14 January 2010

After “Port-au-Prince” – stay alert:


After “Port-au-Prince” – stay alert:
1).’Black’ & ‘White’ killing the 1901 building;
2).PayPoint – (a) eat;
3).PayPoint – (b) filling the ES4 form;
4).Sainsbury’s - tiefs (200 000 rubles = € 4 654);
5) Cú nuar waiting for me at my porch;